Search
Facebook Friends
Newsletter Subscription

To Receive & Download Information
For FREE
Please Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

2012
Are you Ready for 2012?

2012 Official Countdown
Are you Ready For December 2012?
Do You Know What Will Happen?

December 21, 2012
What Does this Date Mean For You,
Your Family and Friends?

What Will Happen in 2012
Find Out Today to GetThe Truth,
2012 Guide, Audio and Survival Kit

"Are Your Ready" For 2012?
The Truth about 2012 Exposed.
See what Really Happens in 2012.

Jim Rogers Discusses Bernanke Reappointment-Fed Policy



Jim Rogers, chairman of Rogers Holdings, and Kirby Daley, a senior strategist at Newedge Group’s prime brokerage business, talk with Bloomberg’s Bernard Lo about the prospects for Federal Reserve chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s reappointment. . Jim Rogers Gerald Celente ron paulalex jones peter schiff glenn beck goldman sachs housing market tarp wall st fed reserve interest rates jim rogers gold silver etf Max Keiser Jim Rogers street Tim Geithner henry paulson

25 Responses to “Jim Rogers Discusses Bernanke Reappointment-Fed Policy”

  • treon123456 says:

    they say the congress and vvall st doesnt knovv vvhats goin on…they knovv exactly vvhats goin on..THIER ROBBIN US!

  • bjarnet3 says:

    What they do in Washington is called, Central Planning and it has never worked in the history of Mankind.

  • sickoftards says:

    where do you get off saying that? what do you think jews can do no wrong? do you think if a jew does something it MUST be good? it is you that are the clown. i am against racists and am jewish myself but i wont stoop to your tribalistic propaganda…grow up.

  • unameitltd says:

    so how does that work exactly?

    Is it like: if you critize the economic insanity of a person who unrelated to their actions just so happens to be Jewish, they your automatically anti-semite?

    Nobody buys that propaganda anymore and you should stop trying to sell it.

    This is America and nobody in charge of anything gets to be exempt from the complaints of others.

  • MrFatbee says:

    All of these clowns are anti-semites .

  • slickbtk says:

    an honest person running a central bank is an oxymoronic statement if ive ever heard one. the only way to have good money is the same way we have anything else that is good,and that is a free market, remember money is a product no different than anyother product. the only reason this particular product is often price controlled and monopolized by gov/central bank is its ease of power and control and robbery. do you think it would be smooth if there was a central cell phone maker?its no different

  • 2wheels88 says:

    Well you can if you tie money back to the gold standard as it use to be.And of course you want someone that is a true american that loves the constitution if you want an honest person running your central bank!!! I don’t suggest anyone try to fix the broken one and I don’t see your suggestions only your complaints.

  • JHJennings says:

    okay okay

  • slickbtk says:

    well I take issue with the idea that gov can solve problems if only it was done right or led right. The only way gov can solve a problem is by not interfering. the federal gov only is benificial with defense and courts, nothing else. anything else it does is not helping only hurting. the obstacles to freedom is the gov. health care, edu, entitlements, social security and so on are all problems that can only be solved if gov stopped interfering and/or never interfered in the first place.

  • slickbtk says:

    well you cant be a constitutionalist and be the head of a central bank at the same time because that is unconstitutional. you cant emit bills of credit and fiat and be a constitutionalist. its like appointing a peace lover to the head of a terrorist group, its contradictory. the only was money works is in a free market without someone interfering with interest rates and without fractional reserve counterfit. ron paul himself knows he cant run the fed becuase its an impossible task anyway

  • JHJennings says:

    I think the electorate is usually BRILLIANT but only when there is strong leadership, willing to “bite the bullet” to respond to difficult problems, willing to inspire people to attack obstacles to freedom, willing to make a priority of solving problems. We haven’t had that in decades.

  • slickbtk says:

    well the problem in washington is not the lack of leadershipt , its the leadership leading us down the road to serfdom that is the problem. And leadership in washington is a bad thing because they dont have any constitutional or logical authority to lead anything except for few and limited gov functions, certainly not the economy, heath care, banking or anything of the like. a system of courts and national defense are the only thing the gov should participate in

  • JHJennings says:

    Wow, you’ve added new dimension to the concept of optimism! I like your thinking but …I don’t think so. My solution is new leadership in governmetn and industry. Leadership has been lacking in ALL parties and this must change. Companies like FORD, SOUTHWEST, APPLE have shown leadership lately. Maybe a few politicians have overcome some of their sliminess. There MAY be a few new leaders in govt. if not, we’re in trouble!

  • slickbtk says:

    perhaps you are right, but I think there is a good chance that in the next year or two when our currency and banking system collapses the populous might by default become educated and well versed in the horrors of the fed and the impossible tasks of a central bank. so atleast we might get some good things out of the coming collapse

  • panphrack says:

    Jim Rogers / Ron Paul 2012

  • JHJennings says:

    As with many aspects of banking, the electorate is largely uninformed and can’t debate the existence of “The Fed”. That alone will leave things mostly as they are. I just don’t believe anyone in govt. will dissolve The Fed. What we might do is campaign for leadership that would gradually reduce it to nothing.

  • slickbtk says:

    well I agree that it is very hard to get rid of a jewish culture of parasitic banking cartels, however its not like murder or something where we could say that we cant get rid of it but we can try to minimize it,because central banking is only possible because of laws. I think we should not aim low and simply say we want to limit the damage and corruption of central banking since it is something that can be 100% controlled by law and stopped. but im for any destruction of it small or total.

  • JHJennings says:

    Yeah, I agree with you that we don’t have to have a Federal Reserve but I doubt we would be successful in dissolving it. We might be successful in marginalizing its effectiveness.

  • slickbtk says:

    @JHJennings no we dont have to have someone. its like if I asked you who should be the head of orginized crime, we have to have someone. the fed serves only bad and detrimental purposes. all it does is harm.

  • rollsthepaul says:

    Obama views Bernanke as a hero. Obama must go.

  • iknownothingnow says:

    Excellent video. Thank you for posting!

  • libertyeconomics says:

    Charles Plosser for replacement

  • troutmasks says:

    Anyone who would abdicate this throne.

  • 2wheels88 says:

    I would open a new true federal reserve which is truly public and run by the country not a private bank with a name which makes it sound federal.Then appoint a true liberitarian constitutionalist that is great with figures, meanwhile force the fake private so called fed to change there name or face charges!!!

  • curtatlanta says:

    How about Ron Paul for Fed Head.

Leave a Reply